On Nov 9, 2012, at 9:27 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
> > What is your expectation re the role or non-role of the Fixing AppCache CG re > AppCache.NG? Will the CG close and _all_ AppCache.NG work be done by WebApps > (on public-webapps)? Will the CG have some role e.g. working on UCs and > Requirements? [I just noticed it's a relatively small group (31 people) > although I didn't try to intersect the mail lists.] >From my point of view that is for the Web Apps WG and the Fixing AppCache CG >to work out; most particularly those individuals in either or both who will be >active in the AppCache NG work. > > (BTW, I agree with those that interpret WebApps' charter such that the > charter will need to be formally updated to add AppCache.NG.) By "formally updated" do you mean the fast-track path to add a deliverable with AC approval, or a full recharter? It is still not totally clear to me which is expected. Cheers, Maciej
