-public-webapps, +www-archive
Hi Glenn,
You wrote:
> My position w.r.t WHATWG documents is that they should never be
> referenced by a W3C document unless there is no other option. Why do I
> say this? […T]he W3C should not reference a document for which the IPR
> status is not sufficiently well defined[…]
Is it your position that the IPR process of W3C Community Groups is not
sufficiently well defined? Remember that the WHATWG is a Community
Group here at the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/community/whatwg/
Ted
