Henri Sivonen <[email protected]>, 2013-01-22 09:52 +0200: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > All of which is true for EPUB2 I guess. But my point was that there is no > > strong technical reason to perpetuate the XHTML-only requirement further > > into EPUB3 -- and (to repeat something for emphasis) that text/html HTML > > could be made usable in EPUB3 books simply by having the EPUB3 spec state > > that HTML is usable in EPUB3 books. > > Considering what I said in this email and in the one you replied to, I > think it made sense to limit EPUB3 to XHTML-only, too.
Yeah, I can see that now. Still, it's sad. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
