http://www.w3.org/TR/d4e/ still gives me a W3C "Document Not Found" error page.
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Travis Leithead < [email protected]> wrote: > I think I got that fixed just now. Give it a shot...**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик) [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 10:23 AM > *To:* Travis Leithead > *Cc:* Anne van Kesteren; www-archive > > *Subject:* Re: UI Events question**** > > ** ** > > The "Latest published version" link is still doesn't do the right thing.** > ** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Travis Leithead < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > Looks like Gary beat me to fixing the links. Thanks!**** > > **** > > *From:* Travis Leithead > *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 10:07 AM > *To:* 'Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик)'; Anne van Kesteren > *Cc:* www-archive > *Subject:* RE: UI Events question**** > > **** > > Oops. I can adjust those auto-generated links...**** > > **** > > On DOM3... As Gary mentioned, we're focusing on the new stuff in UI > Events. There was a lot of legacy prose that probably doesn't need to carry > forward, especially given that most of the raw event model stuff is in > DOM4. I suppose as we add/adjust functionality from the other UI Events, > they will be added in as needed. We may need a more coherent story than > this for FPWD, but for now, this is working OK.**** > > **** > > *From:* Gary Kačmarčík (Кошмарчик) > [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > > *Sent:* Monday, February 11, 2013 5:57 AM > *To:* Anne van Kesteren > *Cc:* Travis Leithead; www-archive > *Subject:* Re: UI Events question**** > > **** > > **** > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> > wrote:**** > > Hey, > > The links in https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/d4e/raw-file/tip/source_respec.htm > 404. I was planning to link to this specification from DOM, but I'm > not sure where to point now.**** > > **** > > The rename from "d4e" -> "uievents" seems to have broken the > auto-generated links at the top. It looks like we'll have to move the > repository from hg/d4e to hg/uievents, but perhaps Travis knows a more > clever way of resolving this.**** > > **** > > Also, will this specification include all > the prose from DOM Level 3 Events that's not superseded by DOM? That's > the plan right?**** > > **** > > At the moment, we're focusing on new content, but I'm not against merging > the DOM3 content.**** > > ** ** >
