On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Luc Moreau <[email protected]> wrote: > agreed. or prov:provenance?
+1, I think this simpler style that looks nicer for the purpose of link headers. Also for prov:queryservice or prov:query_service this style would avoid the slightly confusing ownership implication by 'has' (it could be a third-party query service) However in the RDF version of using Prov-AQ (and I think the terms should be the same both for the Link URIs and the RDF predicates) this would go against the general verb-and-show-directionality-style of PROV-O properties. However, for the PROV-AQ terms (see below) the directionality is quite clear. So in Luc's style, the PROV-AQ Link types would be (the expanded version of): prov:provenance prov:anchor prov:queryservice (or prov:query_service) prov:pingback Ie. the PROV-XX HTMLs would include instead something like this in <head.: <link rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#provenance"; href="prov-XX-prov.ttl" /> -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
