On Jul 16, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Sandro Hawke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Or this one >> >> <> a rdf:DirectDataset. >> GRAPH _:a { <s> <p> <o> } >> GRAPH _:b { <s> <p> <o> } >> GRAPH _:c { _:a _:a _:a } >> GRAPH _:d { _:b _:b _:b } >> >> does _:c = _:d ? >> > > Nope. Oh that one surprise me, I would have thought with graph literals that this would be the case: with each being just syntax for { { <s> <p> <o> } { <s> <p> <o> } { <s> <p> <o> } }
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.or... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w... Jeremy J Carroll
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://w... Sandro Hawke
- Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http... Jeremy J Carroll
