> OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October > 17.
Status? /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: Michael[tm] Smith [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:28 PM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Robin Berjon ([email protected]); Aaron Colwell <[email protected]> ([email protected]); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby ([email protected]); [email protected] Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification Hi Paul, OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17. --Mike Paul Cotton <[email protected]>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000: > There appears to have been some confusion here. The WG Decision clearly > stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the > publication date. > > /paulc > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Michael[tm] Smith > Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: Robin Berjon ([email protected]); Aaron Colwell <[email protected]> > ([email protected]); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby > ([email protected]); [email protected] > Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of > the “Media Source Extensions” specification > > Hi Paul, > > Paul Cotton <[email protected]>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000: > > > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with > > > Robin and/or Mike > > > > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published? Is it going to be > > published before next week’s publishing moratorium? > > No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that > before we can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set > an end date/deadline for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now > before September 5, and the LC-comments end date needs to be at least > 3 weeks after that, so that means an end date of September 26th at the > earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd probably be prudent to have an LC > comments period longer than 3 weeks. > > --Mike > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
