On 8 April 2014 02:28, Larry Masinter <masin...@adobe.com> wrote: > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/tr46-12.html
Unless you have a specific, perhaps outdated, version in mind, the best links to use are http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/proposed.html (when there is an update underway), or http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/ (when there isn't). As far as punycode goes, #46 is intended to be agnostic, meaning that it is only intended for those schemes where punycoding is the practice. However, I see that it is not clear from the spec. Could you please, if you haven't already done so, request a clarification with the http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr46/#Feedback form? The next meeting is in early May, where there is an opportunity to correct this. That is the last opportunity to consider feedback before the document goes final this summer, with Unicode 7.0. (Of course, will be subsequent versions, but the next is not expected until summer 2015.) Mark <https://google.com/+MarkDavis> *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
