Eric, On 2 Jul 2014, at 4:34 pm, Eric J. Bowman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >> after all, if you trust someone to be a contributor to the Web >> architecture, surely you trust them to know the difference between >> company interests and the Webs'? >> > > Seriously? Really, seriously? If that's what you think, then your > warnings to me about "disruptiveness" on the http-wg list make a lot > more sense. The only e-mail to you that I find in my Sent Mail even remotely along these lines is: <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]> Were you referring to that, or something else? > But, I must strenuously disagree -- the last thing I trust > is that contributors here will put the interests of the Web ahead of the > interests of those cutting their paychecks. I find that a bit sad, but OK... > Otherwise, architectural > concerns wouldn't be scoffed at as they are. But, as you've made quite > clear to me, bringing up these concerns will get me banned as they're > political, not technical, in nature. But I think that's what HTTP/2 is > all about, so I'd best shut the **** up about it. OK. I'm not sure what's causing the vitriol here, but I apologise if I've contributed to it. I don't believe I ever said you'd be banned for contributing; I'm only try to maintain a professional environment that focuses on data and outcomes, not ad hominems (which dismissing someone's viewpoint because it's "corporate" is). Regards, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
