"Eric J. Bowman" wrote: > > Further re-hashing the facts wouldn't have served any purpose. > Pointing out that the WG needed to step off and reconsider > architectural ramifications proved much more effective, possibly > because someone not named Roy or Julian reinforced it? Not my desired > result, but far better than what was proposed. >
OMG, did I mention Roy and Julian *twice* without mentioning TBL? Sorry 'bout that, Tim! Certainly didn't mean to omit the king of Web prior art! Like anyone else here I may disagree vehemently with at times, nothing but respect. I'm really a nice guy in person, it's my online persona that's the ***. :-) We've never met, my health problems preclude any travel commitments, but y'all should have a meeting in Colorado sometime. It's how I keep up with the NMR world... http://www.rockychem.com/ -Eric
