[Also moving this off list as I don't think it's relevant to most.]

On 22/09/2014 16:06 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Robin Berjon <[email protected]> wrote:
Right. So I can't speak for the people who are working on that, but I can
vouch that they are open to feedback and have no foul intention whatsoever.

I've yet to receive replies to the feedback I gave when it was announced.

I suspect that pretty much everything froze with the objections. I'm pretty sure that Dan will be handling your feedback.

Overall, Anne's URL spec puts us all in a much better situation than we were
when we only had the RFCs. However, there are (likely mostly non-Web)
implementations and domains that are more strictly close the RFCs. If we
could keep those worlds separate, we'd all be fine, but of course these
things have a tendency to leak. As a result, some form of unified URL spec
that can work across the board makes sense to me (though it's not on my
personal high priority list). If there are people interested in the work and
it can be done through non-disruptive PRs I'm very much fine with it.

It makes sense. However, so far we haven't even tested yet whether
browsers can migrate from their current (somewhat broken) URL strategy
to something that is slightly saner.

I was thinking about that. We have a test suite for URL but apparently it's not complete enough to cover all the ground (I haven't checked but IIRC Mike has). Would you estimate that we're at a point where we can try to prod browsers in that direction or do you reckon you need more tinkering on the spec first? If the former, I would think that a test suite would be a decent place to start.

Let alone whether they can
migrate to something they never conformed with in the first place and
which was written while simply ignoring important deployments.

Yeah, I can't say that's something that worries me deeply now. We can see if that bridge is worth crossing when we get there. The previous part is far more important.

--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon

Reply via email to