On 9/28/2014 8:22 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
[ +Bcc: ab @ w3.org ]
Re:
[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc
[2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe#Procedures
[3] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/conf-code
* [1] needs a "Status: ..." type statement like [3] has in its
boilerplate.
* [1] and [3] should explicitly state in their boilerplate that
comments and change requests are welcome and include a publicly
archived list for the comments and diffs.
* [2] include the status of the TF and if it is still active, how one
can join. I also think the TF's participant list shouldn't be hidden
behind Member confidentiality.
* [2] asking to send comments to a private list seems inconsistent
with literally creating a `positive work environment`. As such this
doc should also include a public list for comments and change requests.
In [2] we assure that people can ask questions to a private list. For
example, an individual might feel that they were disrespected and might
want to confidentially ask a question.
Would it be OK if we both had a public list for public comments and a
private list for those who wanted to make private inquiries?
* [1], [3] add these as new components to one of the consortium's
Public Bug/Issue Tracker systems such as
<https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/> and include a link to
the tracker in the document's boilerplate.
