Anne Does this mean it is basically editorial and does not impact implementations and testing etc?
If so, then perhaps we can make this change and still progress to PR without cycling through additional process. (It would depend on the degree of edits.) If this is the case, perhaps Anssi can prepare a PR draft with these changes and we can look at the redline. We could then do a new CfC to publish if necessary (depending on the extent of the edits) regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair DAP @fjhirsch On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Frederick Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> We are already at the stage of being ready to enter PR on this draft which >> already has implementations. >> >> These sound like v2 features that we should consider for the next revision. >> >> Do you agree. > > It's basically refactoring of the text that is already there so that > it can be repurposed elsewhere. I'm happy to reference whatever, but > it would be nice to have something within some reasonable amount of > time so I don't have to monkey patch. > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/
