[ Caveat: I'm no longer an HTML WG participant, so this reply does not represent the HTML WG's position ]
olivier Thereaux wrote: > in http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3385 we received a > bug report claiming that the validator does not complain about the > lack of xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; in <html> element for > XHTML 1.1. Indeed, this is a requisite for a strictly conformant > document[1], but a quick look at the (flat) XHTML 1.1 DTD doesn't > show me that this attribute is #REQUIRED. > > Am I missing something? Is this an omission in the DTD? On purpose? See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2000OctDec/0045 > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/conformance.html#strict -- Masayasu Ishikawa / [EMAIL PROTECTED] W3C - World Wide Web Consortium
