Hi Rich,

Yes, I just re-read your email, and realised what you were saying. Sorry about that.

However, using an element in this way sounds just like the plain text equivalent of @role, which therefore means it would probably have wider applicability than just <action>. I wonder if we should look at trying to generalise this.

Any thoughts on that?

Regards,

Mark


--
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

On 11 Nov 2007, at 21:46, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

Hi Mark,

Not the same. purpose is just the description. When providing the information to an assistive technology we can enumerate the named actions.

Rich


Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
<graycol.gif>Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Mark Birbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
11/11/2007 03:26 PM

<ecblank.gif>
To
<ecblank.gif>
Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<ecblank.gif>
cc
<ecblank.gif>
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
<ecblank.gif>
Subject
<ecblank.gif>
Re: Comment on XML 2 Events
<ecblank.gif><ecblank.gif>

Hi Rich,

Are you sure it wasn't consciously dropped in favour of @role? It's
the kind of thing we'd do. :)

Regards,

Mark

--
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

On 9 Nov 2007, at 20:32, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

> The <purpose> element was dropped from actions in the XML Events 2
> specification. If you recall we had a purpose element as a child of
> the old handler element which is now called <action>. We need
> purpose to be a child of this.
>
> <purpose> would contain text describing the purpose of the action
> which could be supported by a platform accessibility api to list
> the actions that can beformed on a document object.
>
> I would request that this be added.
>
> Rich
>
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
> Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
>





Reply via email to