Mike Meyer wrote: > I want something that has the same looks and interface as a > link. [and yet invokes METHOD=POST] I suggest it would be anti-social to take this bit of user interface that everybody knows and radically change the semantics of it. Right now, everybody knows its harmless to follow a link, just like it's harmless to turn the pages of a book. It would be antisocial if, by turning to page 100, I deleted my bank account or some such. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ tel:+1-512-310-2971 (office, mobile) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (put your tel# in the Subject:)
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Paul Burchard
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Al Gilman
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Scott Orshan
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Mike Meyer
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Al Gilman
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Koen Holtman
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Mike Meyer
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Al Gilman
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Mike Meyer
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Mike Meyer
- Re: Static? Dynamic? William F. Hammond
- Re: Static? Dynamic? John Martin
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Dan Connolly
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Yves Lafon
- Re: Static? Dynamic? John Martin
- Re: Static? Dynamic? Patrick McManus
