RE: What is at the end of the namespace?

[Patrick . Stickler]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Leigh Dodds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 November, 2001 12:38
> To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere); [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: What is at the end of the namespace?
> 
> 
> > That's like saying that, because a 'mailto:' URI is a URI and
> > URI's can identify anything, I can use a 'mailto:' URI to 
> > denote an abstract concept and software should *know* that
> > it means the abstract concept and not a way to send some
> > content to a particular mailbox.
> 
> Won't its meaning be implied by the context of its usage?

Yeah, right, like the context of namespace URI implies the
opaque identifier of a global naming partition, not something
to be dereferenced...

If what you suggest is true, then we can toss out all URI
prefixes such as http: mailto: ftp: etc. because, after
all, their meaning will be implied by context, eh? I.e.
intead of having 

   ftp://foo.abc.com
   http:/foo.abc.com

I can just use

   uri://foo.abc.com

and whether I need HTTP or FTP access will be clear from context, eh?

Sorry. Nope.

;-)

Patrick