> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Roy T. Fielding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 16 November, 2001 22:40
> To: Stickler Patrick (NRC/Tampere)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: What is at the end of the namespace?
>
>
> > Are you saying that HTTP URLs are also URNs?
>
> No, URNs are only those URI that start with a "urn" scheme.
I disagree.
Yes, I know that the recent "clarification" could be interpreted
to say that, but it doesn't actually *say* that ;-)
The abstract concept of URN is still a valid concept by which
to describe and classify URI schemes, and I intend to submit
I-D proposals for just such a URN scheme that compliments
the 'urn:' scheme. And one could also assert that the 'tag:'
URI scheme is a URN scheme.
Thus, similarly, one can view PURLs as essentially being URNs
but URNs for which the agency handling the mapping to URL is
defined in the URI itself.
> What I said is
> that HTTP URLs are identifiers, and hence names, and
> therefore capable of
> being a symbolic replacement for any other identifier, including URNs.
And I never said that folks *couldn't* use HTTP URLs as names,
only that they *shouldn't*, because it is IMO unreasonable to presume
that HTTP URLs would have an interpretation not in any way related
to the HTTP protocol.
Patrick
