Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > None of the manpages for version 2.6d have the blank line before the
> > '.TH', I fixed this already. If there are any errors though I would
> > be interested to know.
>
> Strange, you're right. I guess I messed up in an earlier version (I
> applied the patch from 2.6c to 2.6d this time). BTW, could you supply
> the patch in unified diff format? That's smaller and much easier to use
> when some other minor changes are already in the file. And it's easier
> for humans to read :-) I.e. use -u option for (GNU) diff.
I agree that the -u option is better for readability, it is what I
normally use when creating patches for myself or comparing versions of
files. I don't use it with WWWOFFLE because it requires that the user
has GNU patch installed, but WWWOFFLE is used on systems that don't
have GNU patch.
--
Andrew.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew M. Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/
WWWOFFLE users page:
http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/wwwoffle/version-2.6/user.html
