On Fri 10 Oct 2003, Andrew M. Bishop wrote: > > In the case shown above WWWOFFLE would have assumed that it is > deflate, but since it cannot decompress it (the error comes from > zlib, not from WWWOFFLE) then it would seem that it is not. > > If anybody else finds any sites that don't work with the WWWOFFLE > decompression functions in version 2.8 I would like to know the > address so that I can do some testing.
I found another one: http://www.faqs.org/docs/htmltut/forms/_FIELDSET.html The strange thing is that http://www.faqs.org/docs/htmltut/forms/ _does_ work. Leads one to suspect that perhaps those other docs are pre-compressed or such... > > Completely unrelated, a couple of other points: > > > > - This is given twice in the conf/wwwoffle.conf file: > > > > # [<URL-SPEC>] only-same-host-images = yes | no > > # If the only images that are fetched are the ones that are on > > # the same > > # host as the page that references them (default=no). > > Are you sure about this? I don't see this, the conf/wwwoffle.conf > file is automatically generated from the conf/wwwoffle.conf.template > and doc/README.CONF files. Neither of these have the repeated text in > them (and nowhere does it have the strange formatting that you show). Hmm, something probably went wrong at my end :) The strange formatting is probably due to vim wrapping the text when I pasted it (I have vim set to wrap at 72 for email messages). Sorry for the confusion here. Paul Slootman
