[WWWOFFLE-Users] 'purge' output

[micha]

A note to my previous posting (i've already anhiliated it, sorry for the new 
posting).
It's not really a problem for me. I just can't withstand to add a comment....
I'm aware that you, Andrew, designed wwwoffle as a 'core' server application.
However, I installed wwwooffle for some people for desktop desktop browsing.
Especially on laptops it's very useful.
To me it seems the straight (and better) solution to what browser caches try 
to cover.
Overkill, at first sight. But not necessarily, if it's userfriendly and 
scalable to desktop needs.
Now, the topic: I think I misunderstood 'purged (10 days) ' too easily.
And i'm sure I'll have to explain it to nearly all my supported clients some day.
I most probably would  not have run into this if the wording would be 
something like:
'not purged'  .......... still expiring but not yet reached the limit
'purged' ..............  expired and deleted
'protected' or 'hold' ...... for age = -1
And i think a clean column output (with header) would make it even more clearer,
regardless the redundancy.

I imagine an output like ....
<<
Not Purged         http://www.ibm.com                              ;   50 kB
Purged (10 days)   http://www-307.ibm.com                          ; empty 
( 137 kB del)
Purged (90 days)   http://www.ffis.de                              ;    13 kB
Purged (90 days)   http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int                    ;   145 kB
Purged (1 days)       http://www.edu.yorku.ca:8080                    ; 
46 kB  		(ok, this is just a joke ;-)
>>

... would become:

<<
status                   URL                                     cache 
   deleted         time left     limit
========================================================================
HOLD           http://www.ibm.com                     50 kB 
---		       00             -1
purged		http://www-307.ibm.com                 ---              137 kB 
     ---            default
not purged    http://www.ffis.de                          13 kB 
---                 90 d          90 d
not purged    http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int        145 kB              --- 
            5 d            90 d
>>

Probably there should be a delimiter for postprocessing (eg. sorting) the 
content, a tab or sth.

(hmm....this is probably an example for the law that the length of a posting 
is negative proportional to its importance -;)

	-- mi.