On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 07:14:53PM +0100, Andrew M. Bishop wrote: > It is not defined in HTTP specification to have a header > with a fragment identifier. Actually to be honest the > only mention of the word fragment is the sentence "The URI > MUST NOT include a fragment." for a Referer header. The > HTTP protocol does not handle fragment identifiers > anywhere, it is only browsers that understand what they > are and they are only valid for HTML type documents.
Hmm, you seem to be right. Sad. I've detected this issue on sending LiveJournal comments - it redirects to the new comment. If anybody's interested: http://zilla.livejournal.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528 What do you think should be done here (in WWWOFFLE)? How would you prefer it to react? BTW, does wwwoffle follows the "meta-refresh" html link? Does it consider (remove) the fragment there? Is there any standard regarding this? "html4 specification" (http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/global.html#edef-META) seems to say nothing about it. -- Max
