Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Andrew M. Bishop wrote: >> I can verify that WWWOFFLE is blocked by this blog and some others >> because of the set of headers that it sends. The script that is doing >> the blocking is called "bad behaviour" and it has been around for a >> while. > > and it is used by sites where wwwoffle is not blocked > (blogs.gnome.org for example claims to use it)
This is strange. Perhaps different versions of the program work differently. >> OnlineOptions ssection of the WWWOFFLE configuration file: >> <http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/*> request-chunked-data = no > > oh phantastic, if it's configurable, then there is no need making it the > default (i could easely apply it to <*> if i wanted to) I made it the default because it is a new feature in HTTP/1.1 so I thought that it must be a good idea. >> I thought that it was so funny that a "standards blog" would block >> browsers for trivial reasons that I e-mailed the address on the error >> page. I will let you know if I get anything back. > > i'd be curious. i think i tried emailing them without any results, but > then i didn't know what you know, so maybe since you can explain > the problem they will actually listen. I did e-mail what I thought was the right address (after removing the SPAM trap e-mail address). I didn't receive a reply. -- Andrew. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew M. Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/ WWWOFFLE users page: http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/wwwoffle/version-2.9/user.html
