On 5 Jan 2012, at 15:36, Dave Tapley wrote: > Personally I feel that (for similar arguments to those for maintaining wxC as > a language-agnostic project) we should pursue wx-config-win. Thoughts?
I think we should get in touch with the wxWidgets guys and see if it really is a patches welcome situation, or if they feel that supporting wx-config-win would lead them to be overstretched. You'll also want to have a look at wxPack, I think. -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
