Hi Jeremy, On 12 Feb 2012, at 19:03, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote: > > Becuse Darcsden uses the darcs 2.0 repo format (not the hashed format), I > cannot push patches from my local copy of Dave's Darcsden to my local c.h.o > (which is using the hashed repo format).
That's interesting. Are you sure it actually converts it? darcs show repo shows that http://darcsden.com/jodonoghue/wxhaskell-wx29-jod is a hashed repo. Do I have the right URI? > > Recreating the patches and their comments by hand would be inexpressibly > tedious, so I wanted to know if there is any reason not to upgrade the c.h.o > repo to the 2.0 format. If I understand things correctly, this has been the > Darcs default since 2008, and it would let us > > Any suggestions, advice or warnings before I start along this path? See http://wiki.darcs.net/FAQ#upgrading-to-darcs-2 I tend to advise people to stick to darcs 1 (hashed) if they have a pre-existing repo. New repos, sure. But old repos, maybe best for now to just stick with what you know -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
