On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 19:23:01 +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote: > * Convince the wxWidgets team to maintain the script. I guess this > involves not just talking to the wxWidges team, but also show that other > people will find the c-wrapper useful.
This would be a big win and I think we may be able to pull this off. After all, wxOCaml, wxEiffel, and wxHaskell all use some variant of wxc. wx.NET have this thing they call wx-c, which I guess is to C# what wxc is to C. Maybe we could somehow adapt this technique? I can foresee this sort of thing helping wxWidgets become useful for new languages as well, or maybe even people who want to use wxWidgets in C for whatever reason. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpc39gxAbqqU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
