I haven't tried perlapp with Strawberry Perl, but if I remember well I read
somewhere that PDK only works with ActivePerl. Maybe the announcement made
by ActiveState wasn't clear.
It was something like "PDK version X only works with ActivePerl version X
and above". Maybe it should have been "works with Perl X and above".... but
I am not so sure because I think I also remember that I've read explicitly
that PDK requires ActivePerl.
Isn't this true?
--
Octavian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Dubois" <j...@activestate.com>
To: "'ademmler'" <n...@ademmler.com>; "'Johan Vromans'"
<jvrom...@squirrel.nl>; "'Daniel Carrera'" <dcarr...@gmail.com>
Cc: <wxperl-users@perl.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 1:12 AM
Subject: RE: AW: Distributing wxPerl applications
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010, ademmler wrote:
hi,
I am using all of those tools and the major difference is the concept
behind:
B) ActiveStae perlapp I could not run wtihout ActiveStae Per . . .
(non strawberry)
Could you provide me with a sample that fails? PerlApp generally works
fine with Strawberry Perl, but I haven't tested it with Strawberry and
wxPerl.
Ideally I would like to know:
* Exact version of Strawberry Perl
* How you built/installed wxPerl (and which version)
* Version of the PDK (`perlapp --version --verbose` output)
* Small sample script
* Did you use Wx::Perl::Packager (which version)
* Commandline used to wrap the sample script
* How it fails to work (any error messages?)
Cheers,
-Jan
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5335 (20100802) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5335 (20100802) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
