Mark Dootson <mark.doot...@znix.com> writes: > Hi, > > On 11/09/2012 07:09, Erik Colson wrote: > >> Ok, sounds fair to me. >> >> I'll check wxpar for where the perl executable is defined. Or is it >> taken from the command that launched wxpar ? > > I didn't realise you were talking about PAR - which is a different > thing altogether. > > Not sure what you are trying to achieve ?
The PAR exec that is finally executed by the user actually shows 'perl.exe' in the process. And I'd like it to be the same as the PAR exec. > But if you wanted to run wxpar and have that process appear as a > different name, then > > renamedperl.exe wxpar.pl Nope, this doesn't bother me as I'm the only one to use wxpar to generate a final .exe. > The packaged PAR exec is a different thing, of course. It's that one I'm talking about... best -- erik
