Hi James, Would you be able to post the file ³Dummy.usc²? The only attachments that I received were ³HtmlDocTest.pl² and ³ClassList1². Many thanks.
Cheers, Ron. On 30/01/16 4:26 AM, "James Lynes" <jmlyne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ron: > > Yes, I meant to include Dummy.usc(contains a wxRadioBox use case) so there > would be something to display in the use case box. > > We will need to cross check the wxWidgets against the wxPerl widgets and > adjust the ListBox accordingly. And generate a use case for each wxPerl > Widget. I can steal a fair number of them from my wxBook Examples(with > learning curve applied since their creation date). > > James > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ron Grunwald <ron...@yahoo.com.au> wrote: >> Hi James, >> >> Brilliant concept and a huge effort on your part. Did you intend to attach >> the file ³Dummy.usc²? >> >> My slight worry is that because you¹re drawing on WxWidgets documentation, we >> would need some sort of validation mechanism that ensures that any particular >> class or method does in fact exist in Wx. >> >> Fantastic effort thank you. >> >> Cheers, >> Ron. >> >> >> On 29/01/16 6:35 AM, "James Lynes" <jmlyne...@gmail.com >> <http://jmlyne...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> Ron, Steve, et. al.: >>> >>> I got to thinking a few days ago about how we could leverage the great mass >>> of documentation already produced by the wxWidgets folks, especially the >>> member function/method documentation for each widget. >>> >>> So, I threw together a proof of concept script(attached) for a wxPerl >>> Documentation Viewer. Download the wxWidgets html documentation(33mb) and >>> the attached files and give it a try. Obviously a lot more could be added to >>> this script and several hundred use case files would need to be created(and >>> downloaded), but that's a smaller effort than recreating all the method >>> documentation. >>> >>> What say ye? If nothing else, it's another good example program. LOL. >>> >>> James >>> >>> > >
