On 10/7/2013 3:06 AM, Steve Borho wrote:
> I found that the second patch was unnecessary once I changed the order of the 
> libraries, and now the shared library is much larger than the executable so 
> I've pushed the first patch with those changes.
> 
> I couldn't figure out why cmake is linking the static libs into the 
> executable, but it didn't seem like a problem that should hold up shared 
> library support.
> 
> Let me know if you run into any further problems with it.

The only thing holding up a serious Libav integration patch
(see my WIP on their list) is now make install/uninstall, and
a few API design issues I'd like to talk to you about on IRC,
and/or the mailing list.

Ping me when you get a chance.

- Derek
_______________________________________________
x265-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel

Reply via email to