On 1 February 2018 at 21:13, Mario Rohkrämer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm. Then ... > > - hg fails determining the version? (I had to clone the sources anew > since I got an "unresolved merge" when I tried to update); > - GCC 7.3.0 is new and does something wrong? > > I'd go with "don't trust too much on the number of commits since a version" in branches with multiple merges into it. > > > Am 01.02.2018, 22:07 Uhr, schrieb Ricardo Constantino <[email protected]>: > > The patch didn't touch anywhere near the version code. It's unrelated. >> >> On 1 February 2018 at 21:03, Mario Rohkrämer <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I just built x265 2.6+37-1949157705ce in MSYS2/MinGW with GCC 7.3.0. >>> Printing a full help page reports at first: >>> >>> x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version (null) >>> x265 [info]: build info (null) >>> >>> >>> A previous version reported e.g.: >>> >>> x265 [info]: HEVC encoder version 2.6+27-2f3c4158cf35 >>> x265 [info]: build info [Windows][GCC 7.2.0][64 bit] 8bit+10bit+12bit >>> >>> >>> The only recent patch I would suspect as reason would be: >>> >>> CMake: blacklist mingw implicit link libraries >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265/commits/a20a6e0fb4f >>> 8e261cb0f8c00f0d88f783c5e9155 >>> >>> Did it go one step beyond the intended purpose? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Fun and success! >>> Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer >>> mailto:[email protected] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> x265-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel >>> >>> > > -- > > Fun and success! > Mario *LigH* Rohkrämer > mailto:[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > x265-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel >
_______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
