Is this patch fixed all load/save issues in smoke/regression test and
should be pushed into stable tip?

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:55 PM, <kavi...@multicorewareinc.com> wrote:

> # HG changeset patch
> # User Kavitha Sampath <kavi...@multicorewareinc.com>
> # Date 1525425970 -19800
> #      Fri May 04 14:56:10 2018 +0530
> # Node ID b97a65d1227fbe8e80ed15a426ec4bc44537c247
> # Parent  147b7dcee675a7cd394125788e12909cdce0c373
> bug fix in scalefactor 0
>
> diff -r 147b7dcee675 -r b97a65d1227f source/encoder/analysis.cpp
> --- a/source/encoder/analysis.cpp       Wed May 02 15:14:30 2018 +0530
> +++ b/source/encoder/analysis.cpp       Fri May 04 14:56:10 2018 +0530
> @@ -2500,6 +2500,15 @@
>                          uint8_t candDir[MRG_MAX_NUM_CANDS];
>                          mode.cu.getInterMergeCandidates(pu.puAbsPartIdx,
> part, candMvField, candDir);
>                          uint8_t mvpIdx = mode.cu.m_mvpIdx[0][pu.
> puAbsPartIdx];
> +                        if (mode.cu.isBipredRestriction())
> +                        {
> +                            /* do not allow bidir merge candidates if PU
> is smaller than 8x8, drop L1 reference */
> +                            if (candDir[mvpIdx] == 3)
> +                            {
> +                                candDir[mvpIdx] = 1;
> +                                candMvField[mvpIdx][1].refIdx =
> REF_NOT_VALID;
> +                            }
> +                        }
>                          mode.cu.setPUInterDir(candDir[mvpIdx],
> pu.puAbsPartIdx, part);
>                          mode.cu.setPUMv(0, candMvField[mvpIdx][0].mv,
> pu.puAbsPartIdx, part);
>                          mode.cu.setPUMv(1, candMvField[mvpIdx][1].mv,
> pu.puAbsPartIdx, part);
>
> _______________________________________________
> x265-devel mailing list
> x265-devel@videolan.org
> https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
x265-devel mailing list
x265-devel@videolan.org
https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel

Reply via email to