Hi Diego, I would try 0.9 as opposed to 0.5 on both vbv-init and vbv-end. There is also an optional --vbv-end-fr-adj parameter, you may want to play with it. May want to tune it, 12+ frames is best at hiding the stitch point. Best, Alex.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 12:23 PM Diego Pasqualin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, I'm revisiting some parameters in our chunked encoding pipeline and I > stumbled upon vbv-init and vbv-end, which seems to be recommended for the use > case (https://x265.readthedocs.io/en/3.1/cli.html#cmdoption-vbv-init). > However, if I set these two parameters I get really bad artifacts, strangely > more intense in the right bottom part of the output video. I took this > screenshot as example https://pasteboard.co/JxVhD78.png > > This is the full ffmpeg command. If I remove the vbv-init/vbv-end it encodes > nicely without artifacts. Any idea on what might be going on? Thank you very > much! > > ffmpeg -fflags +genpts -i big-buck-bunny.mp4 -map 0:v -bf 3 -refs 3 -crf 21 > -force_key_frames expr:gte(t,n_forced*2) -g 50 -keyint_min 50 -x265-params > "hrd=1:vbv-init=0.5:vbv-end=0.5:vbv-maxrate=1870:vbv-bufsize=3740:keyint=50:min-keyint=50:no-open-gop=1:bframes=3:ref=3:level=40:limit-modes=1:rect=1:amp=1" > -c:v libx265 -flags +cgop -map_chapters -1 -map_metadata -1 -pix_fmt yuv420p > -preset medium -profile:v main -r 25 -vsync cfr -sws_flags bicubic -filter:v > scale=trunc((oh*iw*sar/ih)/2)*2:720 -an -dn -sn -y ./output.mp4 > _______________________________________________ > x265-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel _______________________________________________ x265-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.videolan.org/listinfo/x265-devel
