On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:25:03 (CEST), Mike Gabriel wrote: > > > Currently, I see two possibilities (for X2go into Debian without > > bringing up namespace issues), but I might be lacking sight here: > > > > 1. We make X2go work with NoMachine's NX 3.5 (complemented through a > > patchset provided by X2go, this patchset may not break NX functionality > > -> qtnx, freenx, etc., but improve functionality with X2go). > > I think this is the way to go > > > 2. We really fork NX libs, nxproxy (as already happened with > > x2goagent). That would mean a renaming of libraries and also Git > > projects etc, e.g.: x2goproxy, x2gocomp, x2gocompext, x2gocompshad. > > This is the option to stick the head in the sand. let's at least try > Option #1. > > I agree - John
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
