On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 17:48 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 17:25:03 (CEST), Mike Gabriel wrote:
> 
> > Currently, I see two possibilities (for X2go into Debian without
> > bringing up namespace issues), but I might be lacking sight here:
> >
> > 1. We make X2go work with NoMachine's NX 3.5 (complemented through a
> > patchset provided by X2go, this patchset may not break NX  functionality
> > -> qtnx, freenx, etc., but improve functionality with  X2go).
> 
> I think this is the way to go
> 
> > 2. We really fork NX libs, nxproxy (as already happened with
> > x2goagent). That would mean a renaming of libraries and also Git
> > projects etc, e.g.: x2goproxy, x2gocomp, x2gocompext, x2gocompshad.
> 
> This is the option to stick the head in the sand. let's at least try
> Option #1.
> 
> 
I agree - John

_______________________________________________
X2go-dev mailing list
X2go-dev@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev

Reply via email to