Re: DTMDefaultBase & DTMDefaultBaseIterator

[Scott_Boag]

What Joe said.  We wanted DTMTraverser and DTMIterator to have direct
access to the internals of DTMDefaultBase.  Does derivation from
DTMIterator present problems to the SQL DTM?

-scott




                                                                                       
                                   
                    John Gentilin                                                      
                                   
                    <johnglinux@eyecatch        To:     Scott Boag 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Xalan Mailing List             
                    ing.com>                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>             
                                   
                    Sent by:                    cc:                                    
                                   
                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:     DTMDefaultBase & 
DTMDefaultBaseIterator                      
                    tching.com                                                         
                                   
                                                                                       
                                   
                                                                                       
                                   
                    06/30/01 08:34 PM                                                  
                                   
                    Please respond to                                                  
                                   
                    xalan-dev                                                          
                                   
                                                                                       
                                   
                                                                                       
                                   




Scott,

I have been going over this code to see how I can leverage it
in the construction of the SQL Extension. I was going to extend
DTMDefaultBase and override the required methods. Problem
is, the DTMDefaultBaseTraverser extends DTMDefaultBase
directly so I can't use my code. What I would like to do is create
separate classes DTMDocument, DTMTraverser, & DTMIterator.
The Traverser will take a DTMDocument as a constructor argument
so that any derived class can use the base Iterator and the DTMDocument
can take a DTMIteratorFactory so that it can produce Iterators. Seems
like a more generic solution ?? Do you see any design problems with this

approach ??

Thanks
John G