I'll committ it as soon as I can -- sometime today.
Gary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'm leaning toward the second alternative since I think that non-ASCII
> > characters occur relatively infrequently (at least for me) and I hate to
> pay the
> > penalty for a multiply on every write.
>
> Gary, I agree.
>
> -scott
>
>
> Gary L Peskin
> <garyp@firste To: Scott Boag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ch.com> cc:
> Subject: Bug 2639
> 07/24/2001
> 02:14 PM
>
>
>
> Scott -
>
> Can you please look at
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2639
> I'd appreciate your comments before committing a fix. Also, Joe
> suggested perhaps shifting the incoming length left 2 bits. This would
> waste more buffer but possibly save time versus a multiply.
>
> I do, however, lean toward checking at each output as shown in the code
> in bugzilla because it's "cleaner". I do realize, however, that
> performance is also a consideration here and would like to have your
> input.
>
> Gary
