I just wanted to know if your workaround was going to
be the fix or if there was a more "correct" fix. I don't
mind changing the code, just wanted to know if there
was more to test. The workaround works as it did before,
just with the workaround.



Gary L Peskin wrote:

> Scott --
>
> I'm a little backed up on an important project for work at the moment.
> If you have time, that would be great.  Otherwise I should be freed up
> late Friday/early Monday.
>
> John --
>
> Use the workaround for now.  In what way does this not work as it did
> before?
>
> Gary
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Dunno.  Gary, what's your summary at this point?  Do you want to try
> > something or should I?
> >
> > > but it still
> > > does not work as it did before.
> >
> > I would like it to work as before.  To date, I don't think any work has
> > been done to make it so.
> >
> > -scott

Reply via email to