PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1259 *** shadow/1259 Sun May 20 17:24:48 2001 --- shadow/1259.tmp.19384 Tue Aug 7 09:29:42 2001 *************** *** 1,19 **** ! Bug#: 1259 ! Product: XalanJ2 ! Version: 2.0.0 ! Platform: PC ! OS/Version: Windows NT/2K ! Status: NEW ! Resolution: ! Severity: Normal ! Priority: High ! Component: org.apache.xalan ! AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! URL: ! Cc: ! Summary: problem wuth xpath ! problem with xpath: with the expression "preceding::*" with <element num=2> as start node, don't --- 1,19 ---- ! +============================================================================+ ! | problem wuth xpath | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Bug #: 1259 Product: XalanJ2 | ! | Status: RESOLVED Version: 2.0.0 | ! | Resolution: FIXED Platform: PC | ! | Severity: Normal OS/Version: Windows NT/2K | ! | Priority: High Component: org.apache.xalan | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ! | CC list: Cc: | ! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ! | URL: | ! +============================================================================+ ! | DESCRIPTION | problem with xpath: with the expression "preceding::*" with <element num=2> as start node, don't *************** *** 46,48 **** --- 46,53 ---- well. The existing attachment is not readable on my machine and there are too many missing pieces for me to see exactly what you're talking about. Gary + + ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-08-07 09:29 ------- + Andrea never provided the additional information, but I will assume this is + fixed because a lot of fixes went in this area of the code. If the bug is + reproduced, please re-open. \ No newline at end of file
