PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL BE LOST SOMEWHERE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3550 *** shadow/3550 Tue Sep 11 07:31:10 2001 --- shadow/3550.tmp.26351 Tue Sep 11 07:31:10 2001 *************** *** 0 **** --- 1,20 ---- + +============================================================================+ + | xsltc fails sort01, sort32 and sort33 on NaNs | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Bug #: 3550 Product: XalanJ2 | + | Status: NEW Version: 2.0.0 | + | Resolution: Platform: Sun | + | Severity: Normal OS/Version: Solaris | + | Priority: Other Component: org.apache.xalan.xsltc | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | Assigned To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | + | Reported By: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | + | CC list: Cc: | + +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ + | URL: | + +============================================================================+ + | DESCRIPTION | + This isn't that big a deal, but to be 100% technically correct + according to Dave Marston, the Erratum says that on numerical, + sorts non-numbers (NaNs) should come before for ascending and + after for descending sorts.
