DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4396>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4396 Regressions under IBM JDK 1.1.8 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2001-10-25 14:29 ------- OK, I would have sworn that numberformat06, 16 failed on 1.1.8 JDKs and certain vendors 1.2.2 JDKs because of numeric processing/formatting bugs in the JDK, and not in Xalan. But Dave Marston would be the expert on this one I think. I'm not sure why we haven't tried re-writing these two tests to use different numbers that would avoid this issue either.
