A couple of notes: -1 to dropping JDK 1.1.8 support before our official 2.3 release (within a week-ish) -sc
+1 to dropping JDK 1.1.8 support after our 2.3 release; at this point we would require a minium of JDK 1.2.2 to compile & run Xalan. -sc This is essentially a call for a vote by the Xalan committers and call for comments from the Xalan community. If we don't hear clear comments (and have volunteers to help) about changing this, you should assume we'll make this change in the next few weeks. - Shane (P.S. sorry Gary et al for dropping the ball on 1.1.8 compilation last week... 8-) ---- you [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote ---- > I know _we've_ all upgraded (except for folks running MSVJ+, whom even > Microsoft has abandoned)... but when we asked this a year or so ago, some > of you said you had customers who were absolutely unwilling to upgrade. > I think it's time to ask whether that's still an issue, and whether Xalan > wants to continue to cater to (and be limited by) that audience. Sticking > with the older classes may be costing us performance, though that hasn't > been firmly established yet. > So: If we cut over, how loud will the explosion be? ===== <eof aka="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; "http://www.otnemem.com/"=.sig /> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com
