Hi,
I don't understand why this was needed. Also, why wouldn't
the path just include xsltc.jar, since it includes the
contents of the erstwhile xslt related jars, like bcel.jar,
runtime.jar, etc all rolled up into the one xsltc.jar?
Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> curcuru 2002/06/26 06:24:47
>
> Modified: java build.xml
> Log:
> Update docs.class.path to include XSLTC-dependent jars
> Submitted by: Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.174 +4 -2 xml-xalan/java/build.xml
>
> Index: build.xml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-xalan/java/build.xml,v
> retrieving revision 1.173
> retrieving revision 1.174
> diff -u -r1.173 -r1.174
> --- build.xml 13 May 2002 22:18:22 -0000 1.173
> +++ build.xml 26 Jun 2002 13:24:47 -0000 1.174
> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@
> <pathelement location="${xmlapis.jar}" />
> <pathelement location="${parser.jar}" />
> <pathelement location="${bsf.jar}" />
> + <pathelement location="${bcel.jar}" />
> + <pathelement location="${runtime.jar}" />
> <pathelement location="${stylebook.jar}" />
> <pathelement location="${doclet.jar}" />
> <pathelement location="${build.xalan.jar}" />
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
