Hello,

    i did recently a build with VC6 of the latest nightly xalan/xerces 
(2002-07-14, just before the announcement of of xerces 2.0.0 release). I 
didn't yet do any testing of the result though...

    I had the following minor adjustments to do:

    1) #define XERCES_VERSION_MAJOR 2 in the project settings
    2) since I did a ICU-Build and having version 2.1 of ICU i had to 
adjust the ICU-namespace-names used:
       in ICUXalanNumberFormatProxy.hpp:

#if !U_HAVE_NAMESPACE
         DecimalFormat*                          m_decimalFormat;
#else
         U_ICU_NAMESPACE::DecimalFormat*         m_decimalFormat;
#endif

       similar in ICUBridgeCollationCompareFunctorImpl.hpp:

#if !U_HAVE_NAMESPACE
         Collator*                       m_defaultCollator;
#else
         U_ICU_NAMESPACE::Collator*      m_defaultCollator;
#endif

    Regards,

    Thomas

At 21:37 23.07.2002 -0700, you wrote:




>I believe the latest CVS code should work fine with Xerces 2.0.  I'll do a
>build tomorrow just to make sure everything's OK.
>
>I'd like to get a build together but I'm blocked by issues with updating
>the documentation and getting a binary build of gcc 3.1 for RedHat.  I'm
>working on it, but it may take a while.  I also suspect I won't be able to
>do 64-bit binary builds, although the code should be compatible if people
>want to modify the Makefile.
>
>Dave
>
>
>
> 
>
>                       "Samar 
> Lotia" 
>
>                       <slotia@siebel.          To: 
> "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>                       com>                     cc:      (bcc: David N 
> Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)
>                                                Subject: Next release of 
> Xalan?
>                       07/23/2002 
> 05:29 
>
>                       PM 
>
>                       Please 
> respond 
>
>                       to 
> xalan-dev 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>This is a follow up from the Xerces-C++ 2.0 announcement on the Xerces
>list.
>
>Since some of the version macros have made it into Xerces 2, wondering if
>these are enough for supporting the conditional compilation with xerces 1.7
>and 2.0 that was desired for Xalan. If so, any plans on an "official" (even
>source only) Xalan release that works with the latter version of Xerces.
>
>Thanks,
>Samar Lotia

Reply via email to