DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14826>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14826 xsl:document does not work ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-26 14:16 ------- Hmmm. The example at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#forwards seems to agree with you, actually -- it doesn't have a fallback clause, but it does condition the bogus "new XSLT 1.0 element" by wrapping it with <xsl:when test="system-property('xsl:version') >= 1.1"> so it falls in the "not instantiated" case. If it *is* instantiated, then I think I agree that the text says fallback should be run, and fallback's definition (http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#fallback) says that if no fallback clause is provided an error should be thrown. Checked the errata as well (very important step, these days), and this does not seem to have been subsequently altered. (Specific citations are a Good Thing!)
