DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15042 "definitley" is definitely spelled wrong. Summary: "definitley" is definitely spelled wrong. Product: XalanJ2 Version: 2.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other Component: org.apache.xalan.lib.sql AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is minor I know... but the attribute "definitley-writeable" as in: private static final String S_DEFINITLEYWRITABLE = "definitley-writable"; Is spelled incorrectly. Since this is in output (although just an attribute), it should probably be corrected. It would probably be a good idea to also correct the similarly mis-spelled variable names, just for correctness. For example it looks a bit silly as is in something like: addAttributeToNode( meta.isDefinitelyWritable(i) ? S_ISTRUE : S_ISFALSE, m_ColAttrib_DEFINITLEYWRITEABLE_TypeID, lastColHeaderIdx); Where the ResultSetMetaData function has it spelled correctly. P.S. I am not a good speller myself, I just happened to notice this one and for some reason it bothered me... I almost forgot to mention... the problem code is in SQLDocument.java. Also, if the Xalan community accepts my proposed SQL extension enhancements, I would be happy to include this change along with my changes to SQLDocument. Of course if the incorrect spelling is grandfathered, that is OK as well. Art
