I don't think there's any question that these changes will have to be
backed up by perf measurements. I'm pretty sure that's a major part of
Brian's strategy.
-scott
"Santiago Pericas-Geertsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
12/12/2002 01:49:43 PM:
> From: "Joseph Kesselman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Just one quick point: Serialization performance is critical to the
> > perfomance of Xalan overall. Be careful when working on this code;
cleaner
> > and slower is not necessarily a good trade-off!
> >
> > ______________________________________
> > Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
> >
>
> I second that. Brian, I think you should compare the performance of the
two
> processors before and after the integration with the new output system.
(As
> a side note, I believe instead of "SerializerBase" you should call that
> class "OutputHandlerBase" or something like that. In my opinion, the use
of
> the term "serializer" is a misnomer when the output not STREAM).
>
> -- Santiago
>
>
