Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required ?

[David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM]

Hi Per,

No, I got the same problem you got.  But someone reported you can build if
you remove -fno-elide-constructors, which isn't necessary with 2.95.3
anyway.  Weird...

Try it and let us know what happens.

Dave



                                                                                       
                                                 
                      Per Jessen                                                       
                                                 
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]         To:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]       
                                                 
                      g>                       cc:      (bcc: David N 
Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM)                                            
                      Sent by: news            Subject: Re: xalanc - gcc 3.x required 
?                                                 
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                                 
                                                 
                      .org>                                                            
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 
                      02/10/2003 04:06                                                 
                                                 
                      AM                                                               
                                                 
                      Please respond                                                   
                                                 
                      to xalan-dev                                                     
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 



David N Bertoni/Cambridge/IBM wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi Per,
>
> That's very strange -- it looks like some error inside the STL itself.
> I'll see if I can't get things to build on my gcc 2.95.3.

Hi Dave,

just curious if you did manage to build with gcc 2.95.3 ?


/Per Jessen, Zurich