DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17136>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17136 Xalan documentation needs polishing Summary: Xalan documentation needs polishing Product: XalanJ2 Version: 2.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Priority: Other Component: Xalan AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nice work guys, Xalan seems to work great for XSLT, like IE6, NN7 or XMLSpy, but server-side. Now would it be too much to be precise on documentation so that people won't loose hours on small things. Like, I don't know for the rest of it, but I stumbled quite a bit on the servlet examples, only to discover at some point that they require xml-apis.jar, something not mentioned anywhere... Also some examples are not correct, for instance: http://localhost/servlet.UseStylesheetParamServlet?XML=fooparam.xml&XSL=fooparam .xsl&PVAL=GoodBye will throw up; it needs: http://localhost/servlet.UseStylesheetParamServlet?XML=http://localhost/fooparam .xml&XSL=http://localhost/fooparam.xsl&PVAL=GoodBye or that spec.xsl is NOT in the distribution so why use it in the examples... that sort of things. I'm pointing that out because it seems a general pattern will all those Apache projects. For instance I had also problems with some Ant tasks... only to discover that they work fine... provided you had an adequate documentation, which again was not the case with Ant. Shall I go on with Tomcat, Struts, etc.? You see my point. Thanks.
