DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16675>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16675 Requst for more convenient classloading with Java 2 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-19 14:30 ------- 1) XPath - There was a "thought" to remove dependencies that XPath had on Xalan, but no one has dealt with this yet. Even if dependencies on Xalan were removed, XPath will still depend on some common package, probably org.apache.xml.utils. This would probably be a good place for the general classloading mechanism. (I'm not sure exactly what your question was?) 2) Recently, dependencies that the DTM had on Xalan were removed (but it does depend on org.apache.xml.utils). You could take the FactoryFinder (and SecuritySupport/2) code out of the org.apache.xml.dtm package if it were put into org.apache.xml.utils.
