in a german computer magazin (Heiko W. Rupp, "Geschwindigkeitsrausch - Leistungsfaehigkeit von XSLT-Prozessoren", iX 7/03) was an article about XSLT benchmarking. The author has referenced two benchmarks: XSLTMark and XSLTBench. I had a *short* look at Sarvegas XSLTBench (www.sarvega.com) and found XalanC and XalanJ are worse than the average and are beaten by eg saxon and msxml. There are only one test, where XalanC is faster than saxon.
Anybody had a closer look at theese benchmarks? Especially: Why should XalanC be slower than most of the Java processors? Are there any other "accepted" benchmarks?
HolgeR -- holger floerke d o c t r o n i c email [EMAIL PROTECTED] information publishing + retrieval phone +49 2222 9292 90 http://www.doctronic.de
